LinkspamAs far as I can tell, your entire body of contribution consists of nothing but linkspam to a very few articles. I will be deleting your contributions to Cabbage soup diet, and if you persist in adding unhelpful and/or redundant links to this article I will leave a message regarding your activities on WP:AN. Haikupoet 16:09, 13 June 2007 (UTC)Hi Haikupoet: I strongly believe that on a page about cabbage soup diet there should be a link to an authoritive website concentrating on this theme. Being a big fan of the healthier versions of this diet it is in my opinion important to link to a website which offers all informations you need, in contrast to the short reviews (only in a fad diet context), you cited. Your sources are correct when it comes to the old cabbage soup diet versions. But they don't take into account the newer, healthier versions (with added protein) and also don't help the reader finding them. The largest website (i.m.o. also the best) in this field is http://www.successful-diet-cabbage-soup. That's why I'm convinced, that this link should be cited in wikipedia.You are right, my contributions are rather short. This is due to the fact, that my mother language isn't english. Nevertheless I have a strong opinion to several themes and where I can, I give a short contribution, source or link advice.All the best GustaeffleThank you for responding. I'm not sure I agree that that particular website is authoritative in any particular sense, any more than any site on a piece of anonymous faxlore can be; as a result, I'd be inclined to stick to sites that describe and discuss the diet rather than promote it. I did notice the recipe page, and thought of leaving it up, but decided to err on the side of caution -- I wouldn't object to restoring it though. Not sure how any other editors on this article might feel about it though. Haikupoet 15:16, 14 June 2007 (UTC)Hi Haikupoet: Thanks for answering. I've meant with authoritiv, a content website which at least collects all available informations, facts and experiences concerning this diet and letting the reader decide if he will go for this diet or not (without apparent commercial implication.)On the other hand a commercial website which describes this diet on only two pages is not worth citing it. Faddiet.com is a perfect link for the term "fad diets" but not cabbage soup diet specific enough. - My two cents...It would be great, if we could agree on this: to offer the reader at least one link to my favorite site - the recipe section could be a great idea, as I've seen these recipe pages are not commercial (without google ads): http://www.successful-diet-cabbage-soup.com/cabbage-soup-recipes.htmlThank you in advance for your attention,GustaeffleLike I said, I think we can go with the recipe page. Though I disagree with your assessment of faddiet.com -- they really do have quite a bit of information on fad diets of all kinds, and it's more a humorous information site than an advertising site anyway. Haikupoet 18:06, 15 June 2007 (UTC)Hi Haikupoet - as agreed on I'll add the link of he cabbage soup diet recipe page again. Sorry for the delay, I was on vacation...